Shortly after his election in 2016 to Seat #4, Commissioner Kyle Becker began his campaign to bring an economic development department to Apopka. But for six years, it has eluded him. But now, in his return to the City Council, Becker may have the support in the community and on the dais to get his wish.
Becker made a brief presentation at the December 7th Apopka City Council meeting, which opened with a slide showing 14 municipalities near Apopka, and their status on economic development departments.
"Apopka is outside the norm in terms of what other municipalities are doing to drive the right outcomes within their cities in terms of economic development."
Becker estimated that the cities in his study averaged spending $331,000 on EDDs per year.
"That equates to $10 per person per year," Becker said. "We know that we spend that much money and gas per person going out to a restaurant outside of our cities almost on a monthly basis."
Despite using that figure as a baseline, it's not a figure he is requesting for salaries.
"I'm not asking for $331,000," he said. "But I am asking this council to seriously consider the creation of this item and fund it within this budget year. I'm not going to ask for a vote tonight, but I am going to make some asks. One is we create an economic development department. And I'm suggesting that we fund that department with seed funding out of the Coronavirus, state and local fiscal recovery funds."
Becker is targeting the funds earmarked for a program discussed during a City Council meeting.
"I sat in this council chamber a few months ago, where there was a $300,000 expenditure earmarked for a reading program," Becker said. "However, I think the $300,000 will be better served invested in economic development. And it goes directly to supporting a key principle in the SLF RF funds."
"It's called building a strong, resilient, and equitable recovery by making investments that support long-term growth and opportunity. My other ask is that we create an economic development director role. And we can all sit up here and agree on what that job description looks like. I have my point of view. But I don't want to operate in a vacuum for something that the rest of the council is uncomfortable with. The third is to create a long-term execution strategy. So my ask her for Council today is for us to get a general agreement for this to be put on a formal agenda for us to formally consider the creation of the Economic Development Department and the economic development role. And I'll caveat that with this... the $300,000 is not for one singular person's salary. That's not the intent. We can agree on what that bucket would look like when discussing the job description. But this would be for the seed money to create the department to have at least a director-level position put in place, and then all the other ancillary expense that comes across with branding our city and things that come with doing that. So I would hope that I have the support. Without economic development, we are the largest city in the Northwest Orange/Southeast Lake County area. All of these cities are creating these vibrant areas. That common denominator is investment and economic development."
Commissioner Nick Nesta seemed supportive as long as there were goals in place to track the department's success along the way.
"I don't hate the idea," Nesta said. "The only thing is just creating benchmarks. How do we track success would be my only concern. It's making sure that if we're spending $300,000-plus a year... I can say your job was well worth it... I can see where the dollars came from. Or if it's not, it's hey, this didn't work out. This was a waste. That would be my ask if we do move along with this is that we create very specific benchmarks."
In response, Becker gave an example from a bordering city with a history of economic development success.
"Winter Garden, for example, puts very clear success measures of how they interpret when they talk about Plant Street there," Becker said. "What types of things are they trying to put there, and they gauge and measure themselves across those key performance metrics."
Commissioner Diane Velazquez also expressed optimism about the presentation and wanted Apopka residents to see the city's vision in a clearer light.
I agree that we need to have this conversation. I want to be able to give that opportunity to Commissioner Becker. He's doing all the research and wants to show the benefit of it, not just for him. But the benefit of the city. We're trying to build our city downtown, and it's been something that as long as I've been here, which is almost going to be 10 years, it's been something we've been talking about. We seem to always piecemeal it, and we're just not moving in a good direction. Something that I am seeing is that we're kind of all over in the city. And if you hear the feedback from our residents, they don't understand what direction we're going in. And what's coming back from our residents is a lot of negativity. So if we can do something to try and give them a roadmap, a vision... this is where we're going, and this is what we want to do. I think that we can bring our taxpayers on board. But right now, I don't see that. We are just all over the map. And I think this would be a good start."
However, Commissioner Alexander Smith expressed reservations about funding a full-time director position.
"I understand that there's a need for the economic development department," Smith said. "I just don't feel that we're ready for a full-time position at this time. I've talked to a couple of other cities where they have economic development directors, and they did not start with a full-time director. They already had a person in a part-time position on staff that assumed those responsibilities, and then they grew into a full-time position. And so I think we need to grow into that. I've spoken to Mr. Hitt (Community Development Director Jim Hitt) at least once or twice about it. Maybe he can consult, assuming that as a part-time responsibility as the economic director, and then we move into a full-time position at some point."
Becker closed the discussion by circling back on the previous year's economic development promises and accomplishments.
"Without economic development, we know where we're at, right? I mean, if our vernacular is fancy Circle K's and a concept Winn Dixie, then we're failing on the economic development front, I'm sorry. We've got a partner doing our city center that claimed last year that that new development that we threw mulch on was going to be done in Q-1 of this year. And I'm happy to have this go on the formal agenda, too. A deeper dig into my presentation. Hopefully, you can all provide some feedback on what you would want more to make a yes decision. But, again, residents are calling for this."
6 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here
MamaMia
Commissioner Becker is still the vice mayor, not the mayor. The mayor has control of what goes on the agenda. If the mayor is not on board with an economic developer and economic development department, I don't foresee it happening. I believe a " strong mayor" position also has veto power, to veto actions that he does not concur with.
Monday, December 12, 2022 Report this
MamaMia
Know your place Commissioner Becker......LOL!
Monday, December 12, 2022 Report this
MamaMia
Anyway, having an economic developer in Apopka is not a new concept for the city. We had one already from Mt. Dora that left there and came to Apopka, at a big salary, and was suppose to walk on water, and be a miracle worker, and we no sooner got introduced to him, and he resigned his position, and left for Maitland. I didn't see anything he accomplished except for riding the payroll.....
Monday, December 12, 2022 Report this
KyleBecker
MamaMia...I've read enough of your comments poking a little fun at me with monikers like "Young Sheldon" and I totally embrace the ribbing as I signed up for that. However, I do want to address misinformation on this thread, especially around such an important topic. Firstly, our Charter does not afford the position of Mayor "veto power" as it relates to actions taken in a majority vote of City Council. The position of Mayor is an equal voting member as each member of Council. Secondly, in terms of setting the agenda, I am still working with Staff to obtain our formal policy or state statute that dictates this process, as it has not been officially articulated to me yet, and I do plan to present for formal action. Lastly, during my time on Council over the last 6 years, we have never hired or paid any position whose role charter was titled as Economic Development, both former City of Apopka employees who I have knowledge of working for the City of Maitland, neither of them were responsible for Economic Development. At the end of the day, I was completely transparent about my desire for Economic Development during my campaign to which I won, I would be doing a disservice to those that voted for me to not try to get this proven practice implemented in Apopka. As always, if you would like to discuss any concerns directly to me, my city email is kbecker@apopka.net or always available for a call or meeting.
Tuesday, December 13, 2022 Report this
MamaMia
Well, I have heard more than enough of the phrase "economic developer", Sheldon. You signed up for it, so you said, so know your place......I still believe the mayor has veto power. I didn't dream it up, I have heard that somewhere before, and I have attended Apopka City Council meetings off and on since 1994. I remember you saying that the reason you ran for mayor was because you couldn't get things accomplished in Apopka that you wanted, as a commissioner. So I am going to ask you, what has changed? I still say nothing will appear on the agenda, if the mayor is opposed, no matter whatever the majority council members want. That is my opinion based on the mayor of Apopka being a strong mayor, legally speaking. Also, I am speaking of Mark Reggaeton who came from a job in Mt. Dora to a job in Apopka, and left and went Maitland. His duties were economic development of the downtown area of Apopka. I am not misinforming anyone. Maybe ED was not his official title, but "a rose by any other name"...in other words, what matters is what something is, not what it is called. That guy, Mark, I am not sure how his last name was spelled, so I probably spelled it wrongly. Do you remember him? I am not dreaming up misinformation Kyle. He was either hired by Mayor Joe K. or maybe Glen Irby, the former city administrator, and it was a very sizable salary too, he was hired at. It seems you are trying to be the mayor and run the show,....poor Mr. Hitt got his head bit off by you, for calling you Mr. Becker, instead of Commissioner Becker. Good grief, Kyle, chill out, you are coming off as too angry at the council meetings!
Wednesday, December 14, 2022 Report this
FloridaLife79
In reference to this topic. I am in agreement that the city needs an economic advisory role. Between debatable topics such as: annexation, the City Center Project, preventing poor zoning and improvement projects. There are too many issues at hand that are required for growth and future development. The more economic feedback that can be given to both the Mayor and City Council, the better the city can ascertain what’s best for servicing the people of Apopka while maintaining its history and natural beauty.
As a new resident of Apopka, there are so many opportunities for further growth potential. To foolishly stand by while new/future residents, such as myself and others, paying taxes to further provide for basic services will keep the current status quo but not create wealth for a city that, over time, can be it’s own unique symbol of Central Florida lifestyle.
Ultimately, the city would have economic consequences to face if there is not a clear vision for what the future of Apopka should be and whom it should be both appealing to and providing for its current and future citizens.
Monday, December 19, 2022 Report this